There’s been a lot of new media meta discussion recently; I wrote a post for the ALSC blog called “Screen Time” is Bad, which discusses the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad phrase “screen time” and Carisa wrote a related piece on the Digital Media Diet entitled Screen Time Vs Screen Quality: Why the Current Media & Kids Debate is About the Wrong Topic.
Then this morning she sent me this report from the Pew Research Center: In a digital age, parents value printed books for their kids. I barely got through the first paragraph when I realized I was confused; they use the word “print” to refer to paper books, as opposed to electronic books. We had a yabber about that, and it was decided that there is little or no ambiguity when you compare the terms “ebook” and “tree book.” But then I got thinking about some of the conference and institute proposals I’ve submitted with a host of other awesome people, and I realize I’m being way too app-centric.
Apps apps apps! That’s all we seem to talk about these days, and I think that’s short sighted. Fran Simon talks about “app mania,” both with reference to the use of technology for technology’s sake, and also in the sense that we ignore simpler tools (like spreadsheets, cameras and text editors) as center points for engagement when using technology with young children. When did the word “apps” come to refer to any kind of technology you might use with a child? (See a fabulous Slideshare presentation by Fran Below)
It’s exciting that we exist in such a tumultuous time, but it means we’re all going to have to renegotiate and redefine the words we use. The words we use shape the thoughts in our heads. For my next conference proposal I’m going to try NOT to use the word “app” too much, in favour of “new media.” We’ll see how that goes.