Listserv rudeness

I posted something yesterday on the ALSC general listserv, asking people to “like” readImagine‘s Education Nation pitch (Go do it, now, if you haven’t already! Closes tomorrow!)

I got this rude response from someone:

Hi Cen,

I think that replacing the experience of reading a book with a child with an audio/video feed, in solitude, is a bad idea.

I think that kids (and families) want and need the slow pace, the interactions, the bonding,  the physicality, the challenge and the adaptability of reading a  book together.  I think that what you call “crazily-brilliant” might be destructive to writing and story and more dumbing down.  I don’t think technology is a solution for everything, especially when it comes to the emotional, social and intellectual development of children.

My values don’t leave much room for tech (“media”) companies like yours to make much money.  But I think it would be crazily-brilliant if everyone put kids ahead of money, all the time, every time.

So I responded with the following:

Hi [person]!

I agree with you completely that replacing reading with “an audio/video feed, in solitude” is a bad idea.

readImagine, the group of students from Stanford that I’m helping (I am a librarian at a public library, not an employee of a “media company”) is developing a tool within a number of California library systems, plus the California Library Association, to bring kids back to the library. They are developing good quality digital books (we NEED something better than BookFlix and Tumblebooks to compete with the content that’s available through the App store!), integrating ILS systems so kids can see what’s on the shelf at their local libraries, bringing in off-copyright content to be accessed directly through the portal, establishing teacher/parent/child analytics with a COPPA compliant social media and content creation platform, and working with libraries and schools to do educational research on the reading habits of children. Paper books are included in this project, and readImagine is signing authors to create original and adapted content, because frankly, publishers don’t know how to play nicely anymore with public libraries.

The more the child (aged 5-10 for now) reads, from whatever the source, the better. There will be back-end access for librarians to localize the content and provide reader’s advisory and highly details statistics about how a child is improving in their reading skills. The monetary gain ($100,000 from Education Nation if they win) that comes from this contest will go to ILS integration, content creation and pedagogical research with the partner libraries. They are working with a number of library systems already and are giving the product away for free because it’s an innovative research project, not a money making project. They are even developing an algorithm that can calculate the child’s reading level according to their interaction with the app, and corresponding adaptive text.

This endeavor is akin to the ebook hosting/distribution efforts of Library Renewal, Califa and Douglas County, only it’s for interactive media for children (in fact, many of the active players in those projects are also assisting in this project: Michael Porter, Sarah Houghton, Paul Sims and Derek Wolfgram are all helping in some capacity).

This is innovation, creative collaboration and technology used intelligently. That’s what libraries are about these days.

Please vote for readImagine’s pitch if you think any of this is a great idea! It closes tonight!!!



Posted on September 24, 2012, in Libraries and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. Good for you! It amazes me how people do not read something in detail before responding. Furthermore, I think that the creation of these tools is essential so kudos for all you are doing to support these students!!

  2. Thanks Lizz! I was beginning to second guess my reaction to her email. A colleague and friend of mine suggested that this lady was not rude, she just tactfully disagreed with me. The responder’s assertions seemed rude to me because she basically told me that my/their idea was a bad one; that we’re only in it to make money (goodness, wouldn’t that be nice!); and that we put said money above the emotional, social and intellectual welfare of children. What’s worse is that she didn’t even bother to learn about the project. I don’t know what an “audio/video feed” is, and readImagine often says “we’re going to make reading a team sport!” It’s not solitary; it’s designed for use in a classroom/library setting. It’s not dumbing down; they’ve signed New York Times and Caldecott authors. It allows the child to create their own stories and art within the portal, so is definitely not destructive to writing and story. This is not technology for technology’s sake; this is the first good-quality interactive book platform that I’ve seen that will be available to public libraries.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: